Liz duToit
Closing the AI Governance Gap
AI is moving faster than most organizations can govern. Tools get deployed before policies exist. Accountability disappears. The people making decisions about AI impact rarely have the structure to do it well. The Change Constitution Framework closes that gap.
Most organizations are already using AI. Few have decided who is actually responsible for it. Tools get deployed, policies get written, and somewhere in between, accountability disappears. When something goes wrong (and it does) no one is sure who owns the decision that led there, or what should happen next. That's the governance gap, and it's not a technology problem. It's a people and structure problem.The Change Constitution Framework is an assessment and roadmap for closing it. It examines where your organization stands across three dimensions: the policies you have in place, the change management holding those policies together, and your people's actual readiness to work alongside AI responsibly. From that assessment, you get a clear picture of where the gaps are and a sequenced roadmap for addressing them, built around accountability structures that hold up when pressure is applied.Organizations that work through the framework come out the other side knowing exactly who owns AI decisions, at what level, and under what conditions. That clarity doesn't slow AI adoption. It's what makes adoption sustainable.
OCM & AI Governance Practitioner
I help senior leaders govern AI adoption before it becomes a liability. With 15+ years in OCM and process improvement across healthcare and financial services, I've led high-stakes transitions where structure and accountability were the difference. The Change Constitution Framework puts the right decisions in the right hands.